Відео

I know this is an older vid now, but what about lowering the developing time of the c41 version. It looks maybye a bit too dense? or would you loose shadow detail?

I'm currently shooting SX-70 film stock, what do you think about the 600 colour film stock, does it have a better dynamic range right now as the the monochrome 600?

Question, why does it look that chewed up near the sprocket holes?

Hang kang

Going to give the motion blur a try!

does the scanner not pull all the dust in? my lab has one of these to and they have mounted little brushes in front of the intake

can you reuse the chemicals

Ribsy, can you find out where Naeem got Sylvia repaired? I am considering whether or not I want to buy this body. I came across your video while searching through UA-cam for various reviews and thoughts. Your video was type and really gave the information that I need if I decide to make this purchase. Can I get an extremely over engineered body repainted in 2024? Continued happiness and success to you and yours. Be blessed. Doc Chaps

Lol. Bought mine at resale shop. $7.50.

So well explained. Thanks so much.

How do you feel about the Pentax 17?

Kevin Smith’s ‘Clerks’ was shot on XX

I switched to DSLR scanning for 35mm, and the difference is night and day. The flatbed scanner I had was not very high end, and had no option for manually focusing or changing exposure. With the DSLR, I can now scan slides and have them come out very close to the original, plus the scans are far sharper. For medium format there isn't much of a difference, but I'm very happy with the new setup.

Saw Oppenheimer on 5-perf 70mm last year and absolutely loved it. Happily, my local indie cinema has a good projectionist, and there were no issues with framing on the screen, dirt on the print, out-of-focus projection or anything. The movie looked so good that I didn't notice any errors in focus. A problem nowadays is that because hardly anywhere has the capability of screening films on 35 or 70, there is less care taken, and younger folks just assume that a sort of aesthetic crappiness is the "authentic" look of film. Last year, In the same cinema, I saw a 70mm print of Interstellar, and it too looked stunning. What I did notice was that the colour palette was vastly superior to the Blu-Ray that came out a decade ago. The digital version was overly contrasty and saturated - all the actors looked like they had been smeared in fake tan. The film print, on the other hand, was rich and saturated, but in a more natural way. You are lucky to still be able to see authentic IMAX movies. My local IMAX scrapped its film projector and replaced it with a digital one. LIE-MAX, I believe it's called. The last move I saw in "real" IMAX was The Dark Knight Rises. The IMAX shots were full-screen and the 35mm shots were letterboxed. You might think that this switiching of aspect ration during the film would have been distracting, but I hardly noticed it. If the success of Oppenheimer doesn't convince other filmmakers that shooting on film is still viable a option, then nothing will.

Love seeing how things have progressed! I’ve been shooting the various iterations on and off starting in the early days of the Impossible Project, and it’s awesome that all of the weird experimental emulsions led to something that’s absolutely ready for professional work.

Someone said it below…. You should go for an older GFX. The 50R and 50S both have analog controls. So although you have menus to set initially, after that they operate like filmcameras. I bought a 50R when Fuji discontinued them just because I saw the dials were being removed. The newer ones have useful features but I hate the shooting experience. Thinking of getting a film camera to be able to go back to the simplicity of analog shooting.

this was dope

link says account suspended. looks like a great product. looking for APS carrier. have lots of those rolls also.

This is such a great field trip! Thank you for sharing!

This video was a waste of my time. You waited until more than half way through the film to tell me that you can processed them differently? Basically you are comparing C-41 VS ECN-2 but in a more obtuse and roundabout way.

Great video as always! My question is: When the film travels from the factory to retailers in other continents all over the world, isn’t it scanned for security in customs anyway? Thanks again!

Just got a Sekonic L358...

Thanks for the video. In what way do you feel that the rangefinder/viewfinder is better than the Canon 7? Clearer patch? Larger viewfinder maybe?

Folders are sleek,portable and full of features embadded inside a small compact element attached with the bellow bearing a sharp lens,these cameras are small but full of majic hidden inside, the pocatable size make them loving by crazy by the travel bugs in the photography field, Folders are Marvel cameras inthe field of photographic gadgets, SKPareek Bhawanimandi Raj India

I have one and I agree with you but would add that no camera I have ever owned was perfect ! It's not my main camera which considering film is the Canon AE1 50 and 28 lenses - enough for me ! Love Film as you can guess BUT - Favourite most productive image maker is my iPhone !

Great shots and great review. Maybe I missed it but what developer do you use with Delto 3200? I just loaded my camera with it and have to buy some developer as well.

ua-cam.com/video/1Avdmw-4zAY/v-deo.html

I feel you should do more research or at least to crop the image correct before yo spend hours to edit and lunch this video. Respect everyone's time, GL

thanks! !! Man that grey "matt" really annoys me though. Would be so much better on white.

For why do they need to do that?

That was fascinating, thanks for showing us that process!

So the money you save on the film you have to invest on the development and you can't really make prints from it? I'll stick to BW and C41.

Great explanation.

good .. keep up the darkroom, more people did to be doing this , its the whole point to be shooting film, more poeple need to be developing and printing for themselves .. its a whole world and teaches you everything about your photography .. more channels need to be promoting this , instead of doing the same camera reviews for the 1000 time ..

is this fuji chrystal archive type II or something else?

24:32 Scanner is smth doing scanning and scanning (by difinition) is registration dot by dot, or row by row, but not simultanious "area' as camera sensor do. Scanner sensors are just one (per RGB channel) row, but not an area sensor. So this digitizing by camera, or as we see on this footage is not scanning at all, as scanning does not mean digitizing.

Thank you

Do you think your energy changes when in NY, compared with the UK?

Ribsy, do you still have Pro 400H? I learned from my own experience the best way to shoot Pro 400H is to use a UV filter on your lens. This corrects a lot of the weird magenta colour cast from this particular film. Try it, you'll see what I mean, it makes a huge difference and there will be much less headaches later for scanning or darkroom printing.

Хорошая камера. Только уж очень простая.

you had a better enlarger in previous videos, I think it was an Saunders/LPL 670, what happened to that?

$7.99 at Target.

I love printing RA but it is a huge pain in the ass sometimes lol I feel like I go through so much more paper and developer than I do with black and white! Also I tried out a chibachrome drum but was having problems with the paper getting a uniform amount of chemicals, I ended up using trays and found my results were a lot better. Glad to see you're still printing stuff, Ribs, you're an inspiriation. Much love from the Bay Area 💯

I just found a c330 on Facebook for $60. It was in rough shape, but I have been cleaning it up and am getting a new lens for it. I can’t wait to start using it.

I've just finished your previous home darkroom tutorials to start my own color printing at home, and just found this new video! Super congrats for the better setup for your work and thanks for the great videos brooooo!

I started doing my own B&W processing in 1968 when I was sixteen, taught myself the Zone System with a pair of Nikon Fs while doing PJ work in college assisted top wedding shooter Monte Zucker from 1972-74 then worked as technician at the National Geographic Society doing photo lithography which led me to career teaching reproduction photography and managing printing plants. In 1979 I had the money and space for “the darkroom of my dreams” with a Bessler Color Enlarger which I used both for making my own color prints and for dialing-in Magenta/Yellow filtration for B&W prints made with my roll film Med. Format camera using a Zone System approach for exposure metering and reading scene range with my 1° spot meter. Thanks to my technical background I realized I could set exposure via a reading from “Zone 1” Shadow tones in the scene simply by adjusting meter ISO until the reading exposed them optimally on negative and print. Then reading a “Zone 9” highlighted object in the scene would tell me the range of the scene in f/stops - EV units and from that and testing I did I’d know exactly what filter pack I’d need to print that scene on Polycontrast paper to get a full range B&W print with detail everywhere. The same approach worked with color negative film to ensure the shadows were always optimally exposed. With Ektachrome and Kodachrome I spot metered the Zone 9 highlight, adjusting meter ISO until they were correctly exposed. I started shooting digitally and posting photos on the Internet in 1994 with an Apple QuickTake 100 camera and switched entirely to digital for my personal shooting in 2000 after getting a Kodak DC290. While I think it is great photographers like yourself are learning and using analog / chemical photography for me I am happy to have it just a fond nostalgic memory because it is far more difficult to get good results, it lacked the immediate feedback of digital, and disposing of the processing chemicals responsibly is a problem.

110? wtf is wrong with you people?

Thanks man now i really really wish i had my own dark room set up lol

Keep this alive I have full working darkroom in the highlands of Scotland teach the local kids for free they love it

I like the way you shoot. Having a darkroom is incredible, more people should go for this. They'd understand better the difference between film and digitalScannig is one thing, printing is another - the original. Never played with color, but I've a B&W at home and love it.it's almost the size of a wardrobe, doesn't have running water, but it's a nice place to spend hours and hours :) If you wanna take a loot at it, here it is: www.flickr.com/photos/jerazevedo/albums/72157717931784293 All the best!